Anayasa Mahkemesi (AYM) cinsiyet de\u011fi\u015fimi yapmadan isim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi talebi reddedilen trans bir kad\u0131n\u0131n hak ihlaline u\u011frad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, istedi\u011fiad\u0131 kullanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6n\u00fcnde engel olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmedildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Mahkeme \u00fcyesi Engin Y\u0131ld\u0131r\u0131m:\u00a0\u201cToplumun hukuki ve biyolojik cinsiyetleri \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015fmeyen ki\u015filerden rahats\u0131zl\u0131k duymas\u0131 trans ki\u015filerin cinsiyet kimli\u011finin ve v\u00fccut b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn hi\u00e7e say\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 gerekli k\u0131lmaz.\u201d<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n \u0130zmir\u2019de ya\u015fayan trans kad\u0131n, 2017 y\u0131l\u0131nda Bergama N\u00fcfus M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc\u2019ne kar\u015f\u0131 Bergama 1. Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi\u2019nde isim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131. Dava dilek\u00e7esinde\u00a0\u2018k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden beri kendisini kad\u0131n olarak hissetti\u011fini ve ya\u015f\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fcd\u00fck\u00e7e de ya\u015fant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131, giyim tarz\u0131n\u0131 buna g\u00f6re s\u00fcrd\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc, maddi imk\u00e2ns\u0131zl\u0131klar sebebiyle de ameliyat olamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u2019\u00a0<\/strong>dile getirdi. Ayr\u0131ca 10 y\u0131l\u0131 a\u015fk\u0131n s\u00fcredir cinsiyet kimli\u011fine uygun benimsedi\u011fi ismini kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, \u00e7evresinde de bu isimle bilindi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mahkemenin talebiyle mahallede inceleme yapan polis ekipleri ba\u015fvuru gerek\u00e7esini do\u011frulayan bulgular elde etti. Ancak mahkeme bulgulara ra\u011fmen 2018 tarihinde davan\u0131n reddine karar verdi. Gerek\u00e7e olarak n\u00fcfus kayd\u0131nda erkek g\u00f6r\u00fcnen ba\u015fvurucunun, kad\u0131n ismi kullanabilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6ncelikle cinsiyet de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi davas\u0131 a\u00e7mas\u0131 ve bu davan\u0131n sonucunu beklemesi gerekti\u011fi g\u00f6sterildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Karar \u00fczerine, 2018 y\u0131l\u0131 i\u00e7inde ba\u015fvuru yap\u0131lan \u0130zmir B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 1. Hukuk Dairesi de davan\u0131n reddine karar verdi. Daire, n\u00fcfus davalar\u0131n\u0131n kamu d\u00fczeniyle ilgili oldu\u011funu, talebin kabul\u00fc h\u00e2linde kamu d\u00fczeninde kar\u0131\u015f\u0131kl\u0131k olabilece\u011fi ve erkek birinin isminin bir kad\u0131n ismiyle de\u011fi\u015ftirilmesini kabul etmenin hukuken m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na vurgu yapt\u0131. Mahkeme ayr\u0131ca \u00e7evresinde davac\u0131n\u0131n kad\u0131n ismiyle tan\u0131nmas\u0131n\u0131n yeterli bir gerek\u00e7e olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na h\u00fckmetti.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yerel ve \u00fcst mahkemeden sonu\u00e7 alamayan davac\u0131, ba\u015fvurusunu 2018 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n ekim ay\u0131nda AYM\u2019ye ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131. Y\u00fcksek mahkeme, \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131l sonra verdi\u011fi kararla hak ihlali tespiti yapt\u0131. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Mahkeme, karar\u0131nda Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 20\u2019nci maddesinde yer alan \u201cHerkes, \u00f6zel hayat\u0131na\u2026 sayg\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmesini isteme hakk\u0131na sahiptir\u2026\u201d <\/strong>ibaresine at\u0131f yapt\u0131 ve isim \u00fczerinde de\u011fi\u015fiklik ve d\u00fczeltme yap\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 isteme hakk\u0131n\u0131n bu maddeyle ilgili oldu\u011funa h\u00fckmetti. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Kararda devletin pozitif g\u00f6revlerini hat\u0131rlat\u0131larak,\u00a0\u201c\u0130sim \u00fczerinde belirli ko\u015fullar alt\u0131nda de\u011fi\u015fiklikler yap\u0131labilmesinin bireylerin \u00f6zel hayatlar\u0131n\u0131n bir unsuru olan kimli\u011fin belirlenmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bir gereklilik oldu\u011fu hususu g\u00f6z ard\u0131 edilmemelidir\u201d\u00a0<\/strong>dendi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\u0130stinaf Mahkemesi: Kamu d\u00fczeni bozulur<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n
AYM: \u00d6zel hayata sayg\u0131 talebi hakt\u0131r<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n